Letter To The Editor: Garrett says to Jackson Free Press/Northside Sun, “Neither contacted me to comment”

September 17, 2015 in Letters To The Editor, Opinion

Socrates Garrett

Socrates Garrett

The City Council on Monday, September 14, 2015 recessed a meeting where the Public Works Department recommended it accept and approve a contract proposal from Denali Water Solutions and Socrates Garrett Enterprises Inc., to dispose of biosolids from the Savannah St. Wastewater Treatment facility. Councilmen said they wanted to hear from competing team Synagro-WWT Inc. and Fisher Construction and Transportation.

The Public Works Department recommended that the city go with the proposal from the Denali-Garrett team based on specifications outlined in its proposal and the final total cost to complete the project.

Denali-Garrett’s “best and final” offer was $15,456,100, submitted on July 6, compared to Synagro-Fisher’s “best and final” offer of $15,525,000.

An article published Tuesday on the Jackson Free Press’ website, distorted and manipulated the course of council discussion of the matter. The article failed to give the “best and final” proposal numbers for either team. Instead it published “initial” proposal figures – which changed for both teams during the course of negotiations – and  made it appear that Denali-Garrett’s proposal was $3 million higher than Synagro-Fisher’s bid.

Denali-Garrett lowered its initial bid by $1.5 million; Synagro-Fisher lowered its bid by $15,000, by transferring responsibility for land-fill “tipping fees” to the city and gave no estimate of what that could cost the city. Tipping fees cover the cost of sending to landfills any amount of biosolids that are not “land-applied,” which means waste material spread out of farm land as fertilizer throughout the state.

Without a legitimate estimate of such fees, Public Works determined that the city could possibly incur undetermined future costs for tipping fees under the Synagro-Fisher proposal and that Synagro-Fisher would have no incentive to limit the amount of biosolids taken to landfills.

For this reason and others related to Synagro-Fisher’s contract – such as the distance its trucks would have to travel to dispose of the sludge in sites in Alabama – Public Works recommended Denali/Garrett.

Synagro-Fisher does not have permits to dispose of biosolids (sludge) in Mississippi, adding to transportation costs. Denali/Garrett has permits for 7,000 acres for land-application in Yazoo and Rankin counties and Madison Parrish, La., with a permit pending for 3,000 more acres in areas including Humphreys County, Miss.

Mayor Tony Yarber, toward the end of Monday’s council meeting, addressed “allusions” of a deal being cut to award the contract to Denali-Garrett. Yarber simply said there were no under-the-table dealings in the negotiations, which were handled by city staff. He said he had no involvement in those negotiations.

Synagro-Fisher’s attorney Wilson Carroll essentially said in the Free Press article that Public Works Director Kishia Powell lied in her presentation to the council, saying everything she said was “false,” without giving any evidence to back up the claim.

This same attorney was allowed to say in another recent news article in the Northside Sun that numbers on the proposals were changed in a manner not in accordance with the law. Neither statement is true.

When asked to produce a copy of Synagro-Fisher’s proposal, Carroll said he could not because of restraining order barring him from doing so. This is not true. The restraining order, granted by Judge William Singletary in August, only bars Synagro-Fisher from circulating Denali/Garrett’s proposal, which it acquired illegally. The Free Press did not question him on this or obtain a copy of the order.

Neither the Free Press nor the Northside Sun made any attempt to contact me or anyone on my team to comment for their articles. A quote attributed to me in the Free Press article gave no context of that part of the discussion thus giving readers an inadequate representation of the point I was making. I and my team were available at the council meeting to answer any questions the Free Press had. They asked none.

The Free Press said I “defended” my record of hauling biosolids for the city. I had no reason to “defend” my record. I simply responded to the council’s request to make a statement on behalf of my team. My record speaks for itself, especially considering that my team successfully completed Phase I of this project as outlined by a consent decree ordering removal of the waste materials.

This, in my opinion, is consistent with practices of the Free Press, which seems to have ulterior motives in its reporting when it relates to African Americans doing business with the city and other governmental entities. This dereliction of journalistic ethics, standards and integrity borders on obscene.

I welcome whatever decision the City Council makes on this contract when it reconvenes Thursday morning.

Socrates Garrett,

Socrates Garrett Enterprises, Inc.